Elizabeth
Williamson
Abstract:
Despite the fact
that Joan of Arc’s death was well-documented, 1 Henry VI withholds the spectacle of her execution—in large part,
I think, because it would have been impossible to convincingly stage the act of
burning someone at the stake. Like some of her fellow martyrs who had their
tongues cut out in order to prevent them from testifying to their faith in
their final moments, Joan is blocked from accessing the powerful combination of
suffering and witnessing that male characters draw on in other parts of the
cycle; the play is interested in staging her degradation, not her martyrdom.
But where does
that leave Joan: what is a martyr without the performance of martyrdom? Tricomi
is puzzled by the contradictions between the Pucelle of Acts 1-4 and the Pucelle
of Act 5; in an attempt to resolve this tension, he compares both unfavorably
to that model of womanhood, the ever-patient Anne Askew. Such analyses elide
the differences between theatrical representations and written martyrologies
and attempt to impose a stable notion of identity on both. Following Bloom,
Bosman and West, my essay tests out the claim that Joan’s flickering
subjectivity “is productive rather than reflective or derivative” and that her
absent martyrdom contributes to this productivity (169). At the same time, I
will attempt to both honor and complicate Tricomi’s initial insight by
suggesting some of the ways in which Askew’s hypervisibility (in Foxe’s text,
especially) sheds light on the suppressed spectacle of Joan’s death.
Selected
works cited:
Bloom, Gina, Anston Bosman, and William N. West. “Ophelia’s
Intertheatricality, Or, How Performance Is History.” Theatre Journal 65,
no. 2 (May 2013): 165–82.
Coles, Kimberly Anne. “The Death of the Author (and the
Appropriation of the Text): The Case of Anne Askew’s Examination.” Modern
Philology: A Journal Devoted to Research in Medieval and Modern Literature
99, no. 4 (May 2002): 515–39.
Mazzola, Elizabeth. “Expert Witnesses and Secrete Subjects:
Anne Askew’s Examinations and Renaissance Self-Incrimination.” In Political
Rhetoric, Power, and Renaissance Women, edited by Carole Levin and Patricia
Ann Sullivan, 157–72. SUNY Series in Speech Communication. Albany: State
University of New York Press, 1995.
Tricomi, Albert H. “Joan La Pucelle and the Inverted Saints
Play in 1 Henry VI.” Renaissance and Reformation/Renaissance et Réforme
25, no. 2 (2001): 5–31.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.